This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 01/31/2017 02:29 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2017 06:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:On 01/29/2017 06:11 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:In addition to this, I'll post a patch for earlier releases (2.24 and older) to add GLIBC_TUNABLES to unsecure_envvars (is unsecure even a word?) so that they too don't end up passing on unsafe tunables.I expected a patch with a preprocessor condition for unsecvars.h for glibc 2.25. Wouldn't this have the same effect than your tunables-based changes?It would, but I chose to limit the change to within the tunables code base. I can do it your way if that's your preference.
I'd suggest to keep the changes to a non-tunables configuration to a minimum, and unsecvars.h is better at that goal, I think.
Thanks, Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |