This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: 2.25 freeze status
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>, "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:00:26 -0500
- Subject: Re: 2.25 freeze status
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <c4cfc6e1-ff9f-c8b3-4a56-38f8d484aa05@gotplt.org>
On 01/26/2017 11:06 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The release date of 1 Feb is upon us and there are 3 release blockers
> that haven't been resolved yet:
>
> - global-dynamic TLS broken on aarch64 and others
As Florian and Szabolcs note there is a relatively straight forward fix
for this, and we should just commit it while I continue review.
> - Fix for bug 20019 causes linker errors for shared libraries using
> longjmp
I think we should remove bug 21041 from the blocker list.
Whatever we might think about the seriousness of the issue, it has existed
for 4 or 5 releases and few people have run into it, which means we have
time to fix it i.e. not a blocker.
> - tunables: insecure environment variables passed to subprocesses with
> AT_SECURE
>
> I've got the tunables one and I hope to post a patch by tonight, latest
> by tomorrow morning. What is the status on the other two?
OK.
So I think we're almost done on the blocker front.
> Also, assuming that these fixes go in next week, would arch maintainers
> like another week to run a final set of tests before I cut the release
> branch? If not then I'll simply cut the release 2 days after the
> release blockers are resolved. If yes then I'll cut the release 7 days
> after the current release blockers are resolved.
No, I don't think we need the extra time. We should just stick to our
schedule. I'll run multiple arch testing on Monday.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.