This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 01/25/2017 04:38 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 25/01/17 15:32, Yuri Gribov wrote:FWIW it sounds like GCC attribute would be the most natural solution (and probably also useful in other contexts). I'll try to cook a patch for GCC if there are no objections.note that even if dlsym is marked notailcall, with p = dlsym; ... return p(); if the type of p does not carry the attributes of dlsym then this can be a tailcall.
Yes, but dlsym would still see the address of the function containing the dlsym call, which is what we need to determine the relevant object.
Thanks, Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |