This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Move wrappers to libm-compat-calls-auto
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gftg at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 14:25:36 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Move wrappers to libm-compat-calls-auto
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1482781202-8156-1-git-send-email-gftg@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701031728000.3458@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20170104094105.3ef966ab@keller>
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:31:59 +0000
> Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch series is OK on the understanding that a followup will merge
> > the existing libm-compat-calls / libm-compat-calls-ldouble-yes into
> > libm-compat-calls-auto, which can then be renamed libm-compat-calls.
> > (w_lgamma_compatF and k_standardF have the same property as
> > libm-compat-calls-auto - they should be built for the existing formats of
> > float / double / long double, but not for any additional formats added to
> > libm, even if those additional formats are supported in future as
> > alternative long double formats. Presumably one of the float128 patches
> > will add a compat variant of type-foreach that avoids building these
> > functions for float128.)
> >
>
> I'll squash and push this series. I don't expect this followup to be
> committed for 2.25, is that also your understanding?
Yes.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com