This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: nptl/test-*-printers tests failing
- From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey at caviumnetworks dot com>
- To: Martin Galvan <omgalvan dot 86 at gmail dot com>
- Cc: <sellcey at cavium dot com>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:01:23 -0800
- Subject: Re: nptl/test-*-printers tests failing
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Steve dot Ellcey at cavium dot com;
- References: <201612162248.uBGMmj6V025910@sellcey-lt.caveonetworks.com> <1481932492.7649.4.camel@caviumnetworks.com> <CAN19L9Hg9oAfZA7kQthM749V9e-k_Qn4Smq0dORZc5c=ztz6-w@mail.gmail.com>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 12:37 -0300, Martin Galvan wrote:
> 2016-12-16 20:54 GMT-03:00 Steve Ellcey <sellcey@caviumnetworks.com>:
> >
> > And just after sending the email I found the problem. On the machine
> > I was testing there is no /usr/bin/python. There is /usr/bin/python3
> > which is why I could run build-many-glibcs.py but there was no
> > /usr/bin/python.
> Does that apply to the UNSUPPORTED tests as well? There are a few
> things that can make the tests fail with that code, namely an
> old/absent gdb/python/pexpect, etc. Do the .out files show you
> anything on x86_64?
Yes, the x86 out files contain:
% more test-condattr-printers.out
PExpect 4.0 or newer must be installed to test the pretty printers.
I don't have pexpect installed, but at least with this problem I get
UNSUPPORTED and not FAIL.
Steve Ellcey
sellcey@caviumnetworks.com