On 04/11/2016 13:14, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 10/10/2016 08:03 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
+ /* Some sanity checks for clone syscall: returned ppid should be currernt
Typo: “currernt”
On its own, this approach looks okay, but I am worried that it sends a message that it's okay to clone processes without additional measures to protect PRNGs and things like that.
Florian
I am not sure if you referring you to my initial RFC patch or the one
complete I sent [1] since you replied to the original thread.