This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 01:47:14PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > There is no need to change which syscalls are used for architectures where > rename / renameat syscalls are available I agree, the original patch only affects new future architectures in mainline Linux (i.e. nobody at the moment, since the patch was too late to catch nios2). The old renameat syscall is not deprecated as such for any existing mainline architectures, it simply won't exist for any new ones. I.e. if anything the test should be about whether [neither rename or] renameat exists, not whether renameat2 exists. Cheers James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |