This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Forcing 64-bits __OFF_T_TYPE and __INO_T_TYPE for new 32-bit architectures?

From: Paul Eggert <eggert at cs dot ucla dot edu>
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>, "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" <manuel dot montezelo at gmail dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 12:42:47 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] Forcing 64-bits __OFF_T_TYPE and __INO_T_TYPE for new 32-bit architectures?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20160606185149 dot GA11555 at reva dot itsari dot org> <20160606185423 dot GA12134 at reva dot itsari dot org> <CAKCAbMiRdHE7bV5=5mk3-rR6fTPdwasG9bhY-iGh7-zNQ8GxSg at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 06/06/2016 12:18 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:

And, while we're at it, time_t?

+1 on time_t. The year 2038 is not that far off. The others should be64-bit too.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Forcing 64-bits __OFF_T_TYPE and __INO_T_TYPE for new 32-bit architectures?
  - From: Arnd Bergmann

References:
- [RFC] Forcing 64-bits __OFF_T_TYPE and __INO_T_TYPE for new 32-bit architectures?
  - From: Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
- Re: [RFC] Forcing 64-bits __OFF_T_TYPE and __INO_T_TYPE for new 32-bit architectures?
  - From: Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
- Re: [RFC] Forcing 64-bits __OFF_T_TYPE and __INO_T_TYPE for new 32-bit architectures?
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]