This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>
Cc: GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Bill Parker <wp02855 at gmail dot com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:12:31 -0400
Subject: Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CALoOobNcJ6MaE3OfhY2KebXa=Z8kzhsgKpoesbzvvhUEEZhz=A at mail dot gmail dot com> <20160531220247 dot GC7717 at vapier dot lan> <CALoOobP0AHXDbX6qiKtpXOhwH8GY+MDVwaxfTSWakumW7+HN4Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20160606015434 dot GG5431 at vapier dot lan> <CALoOobOzkdNfFc-X8J0O8ub=fhN-8seYebH=ZwkBGRMV4p5VkQ at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 05 Jun 2016 19:00, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> I think I can also remove this from xrealloc, since our realloc does
> the right thing when p==NULL.
> 
> +  if (p == 0)
> +    return xmalloc (n);

right, we don't want/need that

i think all the use of 0 should be changed to NULL too
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov

References:
- Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov
- Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: Do we care about malloc failure in tests?
  - From: Paul Pluzhnikov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]