This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: Zero pad using memset in strncpy/stpncpy
- From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gftg at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:47:57 -0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: Zero pad using memset in strncpy/stpncpy
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1461185716-7332-1-git-send-email-gftg at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <5717F3D1 dot 5090003 at linaro dot org> <20160426104120 dot 535e2f92 at keller> <571F7850 dot 7050605 at linaro dot org>
Thank you for reviewing, Adhemerval.
Pushed as 72c11b353ede72931cc474c9071d143d9a05c0d7.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:16:48 -0300
Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 26/04/2016 10:41, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:25:37 -0300
> > Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I am ok with this patch, the only nit is it now calls memset for all
> >> padding size, where for small padding (less than 16 or maybe 32) I think it would
> >> be still faster than calling memset (since dcbtst will be used only for
> >> large inputs). However I still not sure if embedding the memset write_LT_32
> >> would yield much gain as well.
> >
> > Hi, Adhemerval. Thanks for your review.
> >
> > I also expected that for small amounts of padding, calling memset would
> > harm performance. However, I ran some tests, where memset was only
> > called for padding amounts greater than 32 bytes, and I didn't notice
> > any significant changes in performance. That's the reason why I sent
> > this version of the patch, which always calls memset.
> >
> > I also noticed that bench-strncpy exposes a load-hit-store problem,
> > which might be suppressing the difference for small paddings. I have
> > plans to fix this in the future, and, if necessary, limit memset to
> > greater paddings.
> >
> > However, right now, I don't see a benefit in adding the check.
> >
> >
>
> Fair enough then.
>
> >> On 20-04-2016 17:55, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
> >>> Call __memset_power8 to pad, with zeros, the remaining bytes in the
> >>> dest string on __strncpy_power8 and __stpncpy_power8. This improves
> >>> performance when n is larger than the input string, giving ~30% gain for
> >>> larger strings without impacting much shorter strings.
> >>>
> >>> 2016-04-18 Gabriel F. T. Gomes <gftg@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>>
> >>> * sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8/strncpy.S: Call memset to pad the
> >>> remaining bytes in the dest string, with zeros.
> >>> ---
> >>> sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8/strncpy.S | 123 +++++++++++++----------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8/strncpy.S b/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8/strncpy.S
> >>> index 17c3afb..0bb3bd4 100644
> >>> --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8/strncpy.S
> >>> +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/power8/strncpy.S
> >>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> >>> # define FUNC_NAME strncpy
> >>> #endif
> >>>
> >>> +#define FRAMESIZE (FRAME_MIN_SIZE+48)
> >>> +
> >>> /* Implements the function
> >>>
> >>> char * [r3] strncpy (char *dest [r3], const char *src [r4], size_t n [r5])
> >>> @@ -54,8 +56,7 @@ EALIGN (FUNC_NAME, 4, 0)
> >>> addi r10,r4,16
> >>> rlwinm r9,r4,0,19,19
> >>>
> >>> - /* Since it is a leaf function, save some non-volatile registers on the
> >>> - protected/red zone. */
> >>> + /* Save some non-volatile registers on the stack. */
> >>> std r26,-48(r1)
> >>> std r27,-40(r1)
> >>>
> >>> @@ -69,6 +70,14 @@ EALIGN (FUNC_NAME, 4, 0)
> >>> std r30,-16(r1)
> >>> std r31,-8(r1)
> >>>
> >>> + /* Update CFI. */
> >>> + cfi_offset(r26, -48)
> >>> + cfi_offset(r27, -40)
> >>> + cfi_offset(r28, -32)
> >>> + cfi_offset(r29, -24)
> >>> + cfi_offset(r30, -16)
> >>> + cfi_offset(r31, -8)
> >>> +
> >>> beq cr7,L(unaligned_lt_16)
> >>> rldicl r9,r4,0,61
> >>> subfic r8,r9,8
> >>> @@ -180,74 +189,58 @@ L(short_path_loop_end):
> >>> ld r31,-8(r1)
> >>> blr
> >>>
> >>> - /* This code pads the remainder dest with NULL bytes. The algorithm
> >>> - calculate the remanining size and issues a doubleword unrolled
> >>> - loops followed by a byte a byte set. */
> >>> + /* This code pads the remainder of dest with NULL bytes. The algorithm
> >>> + calculates the remaining size and calls memset. */
> >>> .align 4
> >>> L(zero_pad_start):
> >>> mr r5,r10
> >>> mr r9,r6
> >>> L(zero_pad_start_1):
> >>> - srdi. r8,r5,r3
> >>> - mr r10,r9
> >>> -#ifdef USE_AS_STPNCPY
> >>> - mr r3,r9
> >>> + /* At this point:
> >>> + - r5 holds the number of bytes that still have to be written to
> >>> + dest.
> >>> + - r9 points to the position, in dest, where the first null byte
> >>> + will be written.
> >>> + The above statements are true both when control reaches this label
> >>> + from a branch or when falling through the previous lines. */
> >>> +#ifndef USE_AS_STPNCPY
> >>> + mr r30,r3 /* Save the return value of strncpy. */
> >>> +#endif
> >>> + /* Prepare the call to memset. */
> >>> + mr r3,r9 /* Pointer to the area to be zero-filled. */
> >>> + li r4,0 /* Byte to be written (zero). */
> >>> +
> >>> + /* We delayed the creation of the stack frame, as well as the saving of
> >>> + the link register, because only at this point, we are sure that
> >>> + doing so is actually needed. */
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Save the link register. */
> >>> + mflr r0
> >>> + std r0,16(r1)
> >>> + cfi_offset(lr, 16)
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Create the stack frame. */
> >>> + stdu r1,-FRAMESIZE(r1)
> >>> + cfi_adjust_cfa_offset(FRAMESIZE)
> >>> +
> >>> + bl __memset_power8
> >>> + nop
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Restore the stack frame. */
> >>> + addi r1,r1,FRAMESIZE
> >>> + cfi_adjust_cfa_offset(-FRAMESIZE)
> >>> + /* Restore the link register. */
> >>> + ld r0,16(r1)
> >>> + mtlr r0
> >>> +
> >>> +#ifndef USE_AS_STPNCPY
> >>> + mr r3,r30 /* Restore the return value of strncpy, i.e.:
> >>> + dest. For stpncpy, the return value is the
> >>> + same as return value of memset. */
> >>> #endif
> >>> - beq- cr0,L(zero_pad_loop_b_start)
> >>> - cmpldi cr7,r8,1
> >>> - li cr7,0
> >>> - std r7,0(r9)
> >>> - beq cr7,L(zero_pad_loop_b_prepare)
> >>> - addic. r8,r8,-2
> >>> - addi r10,r9,r16
> >>> - std r7,8(r9)
> >>> - beq cr0,L(zero_pad_loop_dw_2)
> >>> - std r7,16(r9)
> >>> - li r9,0
> >>> - b L(zero_pad_loop_dw_1)
> >>> -
> >>> - .align 4
> >>> -L(zero_pad_loop_dw):
> >>> - addi r10,r10,16
> >>> - std r9,-8(r10)
> >>> - beq cr0,L(zero_pad_loop_dw_2)
> >>> - std r9,0(r10)
> >>> -L(zero_pad_loop_dw_1):
> >>> - cmpldi cr7,r8,1
> >>> - std r9,0(r10)
> >>> - addic. r8,r8,-2
> >>> - bne cr7,L(zero_pad_loop_dw)
> >>> - addi r10,r10,8
> >>> -L(zero_pad_loop_dw_2):
> >>> - rldicl r5,r5,0,61
> >>> -L(zero_pad_loop_b_start):
> >>> - cmpdi cr7,r5,0
> >>> - addi r5,r5,-1
> >>> - addi r9,r10,-1
> >>> - add r10,r10,5
> >>> - subf r10,r9,r10
> >>> - li r8,0
> >>> - beq- cr7,L(short_path_loop_end)
> >>> -
> >>> - /* Write remaining 1-8 bytes. */
> >>> - .align 4
> >>> - addi r9,r9,1
> >>> - mtocrf 0x1,r10
> >>> - bf 29,4f
> >>> - stw r8,0(r9)
> >>> - addi r9,r9,4
> >>> -
> >>> - .align 4
> >>> -4: bf 30,2f
> >>> - sth r8,0(r9)
> >>> - addi r9,r9,2
> >>> -
> >>> - .align 4
> >>> -2: bf 31,1f
> >>> - stb r8,0(r9)
> >>>
> >>> - /* Restore non-volatile registers. */
> >>> -1: ld r26,-48(r1)
> >>> + /* Restore non-volatile registers and return. */
> >>> + ld r26,-48(r1)
> >>> ld r27,-40(r1)
> >>> ld r28,-32(r1)
> >>> ld r29,-24(r1)
> >>> @@ -443,10 +436,6 @@ L(short_path_prepare_2_3):
> >>> mr r4,r28
> >>> mr r9,r29
> >>> b L(short_path_2)
> >>> -L(zero_pad_loop_b_prepare):
> >>> - addi r10,r9,8
> >>> - rldicl r5,r5,0,61
> >>> - b L(zero_pad_loop_b_start)
> >>> L(zero_pad_start_prepare_1):
> >>> mr r5,r6
> >>> mr r9,r8
> >>>
> >>
> >
>