This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
It was <2016-04-08 piÄ 14:31>, when Florian Weimer wrote: > On 04/08/2016 09:52 AM, Åukasz Stelmach wrote: > >>> but you also have another option and what most people have been >>> doing: c) symlink /var/run to /run >> >> This does not help to avoid deadlocks at all. > > Why? It may need changes to autofs, so that it can produce the > required symbolic link, at an early stage of operation. autofs works as expected, it does not provide any contents itself, instead it intercepts all requests and put them on hold until the actual filesystem is mounted. I wouldn't expect anything else. I'd say the case we are discussing is an extremely rare corner case for autofs and I'd rather expect requirement for autoconf 2.70 be accepted in libc (-; before any kernel developer accepts a patch for autofs. -- Åukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |