Re: [PATCH] localedata: convert all files to utf-8

[Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>]

On 12 Feb 2016 09:55, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> On 11-02-2016 21:08, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 11 Feb 2016 16:28, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> >> On 09-02-2016 02:43, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On 08 Feb 2016 19:46, Paul Eggert wrote:
> >>>> This looks good. It is almost exactly the localedata/locales subset of my 
> >>>> proposed patches in 
> >>>> <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-05/msg00554.html>. In the only place 
> >>>> where this new patch disagrees with that subset, it is correct (SayÄn) and the 
> >>>> earlier patch was wrong (SayÃn) because Emacs misguessed the that file's 
> >>>> comments' encoding. Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> thanks, pushed
> >>>
> >>> i've also downloaded your patch and applied the ChangeLog parts since
> >>> Roland already said those are "obvious"
> >>>
> >>> feel like splitting up the rest ?
> >>
> >> I do not think this patch fits in any category discussed where we should
> >> lift the hard freeze.  Please revert and commit again when 2.24 opens.
> > 
> > yeah, both of these should have waited.  sorry about that.  usually
> > ChangeLog files are fairly exempt from rules due to their setup.
> > 
> >> This is also valid for CL change (d2bb040b2a2f58b1ef80f01292bd722fce01d36a).
> > 
> > i don't mind reverting this one since it seems to break the tst-regex
> > test.  but is reverting updates to comments in the localedata files
> > needed if nothing is broken ?
> 
> For the comments which does not have any side effects I think it is not worth
> the trouble.

for clarity's sake, you still want me to revert both ?
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature