This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: malloc: performance improvements and bugfixes
- From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:48:27 -0200
- Subject: Re: malloc: performance improvements and bugfixes
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1453767942-19369-1-git-send-email-joern at purestorage dot com> <56A6C2E4 dot 7050508 at cs dot ucla dot edu> <20160126010058 dot GI26397 at Sligo dot logfs dot org> <CAAHN_R3=C476ADoAD0cOPJaw4idGFXzcO3_dj1GLfssehhdsvQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20160126024437 dot GA5745 at Sligo dot logfs dot org> <20160126032122 dot GC5745 at Sligo dot logfs dot org> <20160126062208 dot GA14840 at vapier dot lan> <20160126075358 dot GD5745 at Sligo dot logfs dot org> <56A7420D dot 8010802 at redhat dot com> <20160126170455 dot GF5745 at Sligo dot logfs dot org> <56A7AD58 dot 8070604 at cs dot ucla dot edu>
On 26-01-2016 15:31, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 09:04 AM, JÃrn Engel wrote:
>> Since there doesn't seem to be an FAQ, let me start one.
> Feel free, but it'll be just your opinion.
> As I understand it you have stated that you won't sign anything. If you change your mind and will seriously consider assigning copyright, please write to me privately and I can start the ball rolling on getting you a copy of an assignment so that you can address your concerns and decide for yourself whether to sign it. It's entirely up to you.
And just a side note, the copyright assignment requirement is explicit
stated in glibc development wiki  that is linked in project development
I am saying this because you could have started this copyright discussion
*before* the patch dump itself. It would have saved a lot of time from