This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [RFC][PATCH 22/22] Add Infinity notes implementing td_ta_map_lwp2thr
- From: Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat dot com>
- To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:40:21 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 22/22] Add Infinity notes implementing td_ta_map_lwp2thr
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20151021144250 dot GA18821 at blade dot nx> <5627BEBA dot 5040100 at linaro dot org> <20151021190911 dot GB25328 at blade dot nx> <5627ED06 dot 5040505 at linaro dot org> <20151021212857 dot GA10785 at blade dot nx> <F688AA9A-97E8-4271-817A-C4F4E0201D78 at linaro dot org> <20151022085645 dot GA21239 at blade dot nx> <5628C6E6 dot 7080602 at linaro dot org> <20151022131111 dot GA8616 at blade dot nx> <5628E51D dot 6060804 at linaro dot org>
Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> I would prefer something related to systemtap way
How do you mean?
> I would prefer something more decoupled of GLIBC, so if we need to
> get rid off its support if a new strategy/project shows a superior
> approach it would be easier.
Decoupled how?
> I would also prefer to no be dependent of external interpreters to
> implement such compiler/instrumentation (since IMHO there is no
> strong reason to depend of python or any other interpreter for such
> project).
>
> But also this I also see it is not a strong reason to really oppose
> it.
Ok. Thank you :)
Cheers,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/