This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Clean up state on patchwork
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <sid at reserved-bit dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:08:09 -0400
- Subject: Re: Clean up state on patchwork
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1442410615 dot 2348 dot 19 dot camel at reserved-bit dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1509172302350 dot 2455 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1509252025170 dot 1123 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20150925205526 dot GA1535 at vapier dot lan> <56094872 dot 80102 at redhat dot com> <20150928153301 dot GL5140 at vapier dot lan> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1509281545320 dot 31579 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20150928162143 dot GM5140 at vapier dot lan>
On 09/28/2015 12:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2015 15:53, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>>> What if you're on vacation? What if you're busy? The patchwork queue
>>>> is still really helpful to keep your list of patches you need to go
>>>> back to and resubmit.
>>>
>>> my proposal doesn't prevent that. perform a search where the owner is you and
>>> the state is set to dropped.
>>
>> Dropped is for patches the submitter decided to drop. It's meant to be an
>> explicit submitter decision that a patch is no longer of relevance, not
>> someone else's decision.
>
> OK. then lets simply re-assign all the patches from these people to themselves
> and then we can search for patches that require review but have no owner.
> -mike
Isn't it simply easier to add a "Resubmit" state, mark it as "not needing action"
(so it doesn't show up on the normal lists) and go from there?
c.