This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 12 Jul 2015 15:27, Zack Weinberg wrote: > I posted this a couple weeks ago, but now that the branch has been > cut, `SHLIB_COMPAT(GLIBC_2_0, GLIBC_2_23)` compiles, so I've actually > tested it. ;-) Also, I merged in the corrections to NEWS and the > comment at the top of regexp.h, which I posted separately for the > 2.22 branch. And hopefully it will not get mangled this time. i merged the NEWS/comment correction by itself to keep the master/branch in sync, so you'll have to rebase. > I can see two ways to proceed with this patch. First is just to go > ahead and land it now, and hope that if it breaks someone, they will > tell us about it during the 2.23 development cycle. Second is to > attempt to search for code it will break, e.g. with a Debian archive > rebuild or a broad-spectrum code-search service. I did try the latter > but was not able to find one that would distinguish *this* <regexp.h> > from one provided by the application, and there are lots of those. i'm fine with deleting the header now. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |