This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Siddhesh, Thanks your response. The attachment is the latest change according to your suggestion including the ChangeLog change. About the tests, I did the following cases: 1. Write test codes to check if the (_IO_LINE_BUF|_IO_UNBUFFERED) equals (_IO_LINE_BUF+_IO_UNBUFFERED); 2. Update the glibc to check if it works like before. On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com> wrote: > Please describe the testing you have done to verify that your patch is > correct. In general for such monotonous changes, it is sufficient to > verify that there is no change in the generated code or any change is > expected and contained. Also, run the testsuite to verify that no > additional errors are introduced. > > Add a space between the operator; I know this was wrong before, but it > should be corrected with this patch. That is, > > _IO_LINE_BUF|_IO_UNBUFFERED > > should be > > _IO_LINE_BUF | _IO_UNBUFFERED > > Your patch also needs a ChangeLog entry. The patch is probably > trivial enough that it does not need a copyright assignment. > > Please post the patch with the suggested change, a ChangeLog entry and > a description of how you tested the patch. > > Thanks, > Siddhesh > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 07:23:57AM +0800, Feng Gao wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Both of "_IO_UNBUFFERED" and "_IO_LINE_BUF" are the bit flags, but I >> find there are some codes looks like "_IO_LINE_BUF+_IO_UNBUFFERED", >> while some codes are "_IO_LINE_BUF|_IO_UNBUFFERED". >> >> I think the former is not good, even though the final result is same. >> >> The attachment is my patch . >> >> Thanks >> Feng > >> diff --git a/libio/fileops.c b/libio/fileops.c >> index 7c7fef1..93d0d94 100644 >> --- a/libio/fileops.c >> +++ b/libio/fileops.c >> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ new_do_write (fp, data, to_do) >> _IO_setg (fp, fp->_IO_buf_base, fp->_IO_buf_base, fp->_IO_buf_base); >> fp->_IO_write_base = fp->_IO_write_ptr = fp->_IO_buf_base; >> fp->_IO_write_end = (fp->_mode <= 0 >> - && (fp->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF+_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> + && (fp->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF|_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> ? fp->_IO_buf_base : fp->_IO_buf_end); >> return count; >> } >> @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ _IO_new_file_overflow (f, ch) >> f->_IO_read_base = f->_IO_read_ptr = f->_IO_read_end; >> >> f->_flags |= _IO_CURRENTLY_PUTTING; >> - if (f->_mode <= 0 && f->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF+_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> + if (f->_mode <= 0 && f->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF|_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> f->_IO_write_end = f->_IO_write_ptr; >> } >> if (ch == EOF) >> diff --git a/libio/oldfileops.c b/libio/oldfileops.c >> index c68ca6a..343875a 100644 >> --- a/libio/oldfileops.c >> +++ b/libio/oldfileops.c >> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ old_do_write (fp, data, to_do) >> fp->_cur_column = _IO_adjust_column (fp->_cur_column - 1, data, count) + 1; >> _IO_setg (fp, fp->_IO_buf_base, fp->_IO_buf_base, fp->_IO_buf_base); >> fp->_IO_write_base = fp->_IO_write_ptr = fp->_IO_buf_base; >> - fp->_IO_write_end = ((fp->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF+_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> + fp->_IO_write_end = ((fp->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF|_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> ? fp->_IO_buf_base : fp->_IO_buf_end); >> return count; >> } >> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ _IO_old_file_overflow (f, ch) >> f->_IO_write_end = f->_IO_buf_end; >> f->_IO_read_base = f->_IO_read_ptr = f->_IO_read_end; >> >> - if (f->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF+_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> + if (f->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF|_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> f->_IO_write_end = f->_IO_write_ptr; >> f->_flags |= _IO_CURRENTLY_PUTTING; >> } >> diff --git a/libio/wfileops.c b/libio/wfileops.c >> index 3f628bf..14332ac 100644 >> --- a/libio/wfileops.c >> +++ b/libio/wfileops.c >> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ _IO_wdo_write (fp, data, to_do) >> fp->_wide_data->_IO_buf_base); >> fp->_wide_data->_IO_write_base = fp->_wide_data->_IO_write_ptr >> = fp->_wide_data->_IO_buf_base; >> - fp->_wide_data->_IO_write_end = ((fp->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF+_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> + fp->_wide_data->_IO_write_end = ((fp->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF|_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> ? fp->_wide_data->_IO_buf_base >> : fp->_wide_data->_IO_buf_end); >> >> @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ _IO_wfile_overflow (f, wch) >> f->_IO_read_base = f->_IO_read_ptr = f->_IO_read_end; >> >> f->_flags |= _IO_CURRENTLY_PUTTING; >> - if (f->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF+_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> + if (f->_flags & (_IO_LINE_BUF|_IO_UNBUFFERED)) >> f->_wide_data->_IO_write_end = f->_wide_data->_IO_write_ptr; >> } >> if (wch == WEOF) >
Attachment:
file_flags.diff
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |