This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PING] [v9] malloc: Consistently apply trim_threshold to all heaps [BZ #17195]
- From: Mel Gorman <mgorman at suse dot de>
- To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, Ond??ej B?lka <neleai at seznam dot cz>, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, Julian Taylor <jtaylor dot debian at googlemail dot com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at ezchip dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:43:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PING] [v9] malloc: Consistently apply trim_threshold to all heaps [BZ #17195]
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150316161333 dot GA3087 at suse dot de> <55071DB5 dot 5010702 at redhat dot com> <20150324154645 dot GA20062 at suse dot de> <20150401170238 dot GC32115 at domone> <20150401225419 dot GB20397 at suse dot de> <2106100772 dot 11112686 dot 1427957233362 dot JavaMail dot zimbra at redhat dot com> <20150402071721 dot GF20397 at suse dot de> <5542E696 dot 2060402 at redhat dot com> <20150501100546 dot GE2449 at suse dot de> <20150504150958 dot GU15457 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com>
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:39:58PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 11:05:46AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Also FWIW, my trim patch is still making its way into opensuse. It got held
> > up by a bug in another package that was using uninitialsed memory. In the
> > future if there is a problem that points the finger at this patch, it's
> > worth testing with MALLOC_CHECK_ to see if that "fixes" it by zeroing memory.
>
> Is this other package java? We had openjdk crashing due to this patch
> in rawhide.
>
It was llvm 3.5 regression tests.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs