This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Please clean up patchwork
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
- Cc: joseph at codesourcery dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:48:34 -0400
- Subject: Re: Please clean up patchwork
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1504301629410 dot 23221 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20150430 dot 145443 dot 494305651930857490 dot davem at davemloft dot net> <5542E297 dot 3090102 at redhat dot com> <20150430 dot 223924 dot 850541721269620905 dot davem at davemloft dot net>
On 04/30/2015 10:39 PM, David Miller wrote:
> And this works because they all have their own GIT trees and just
> update patchwork as they apply patches directly pull from people's GIT
> trees. It's just a natural and integrated part of every subsystem
> maintainer's workflow.
That makes sense. I wonder if anyone would be opposed to making
patchwork a mandatory part of the process of being a glibc
committer i.e. add it to the committer checklist [1].
It sure makes my life easier for tracking patches and version.
c.
[1] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Committer%20checklist