This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
pretty much all Linux distros have converted to /run and /run/lock (where /var/run is a symlink to /run and /var/lock a symlink to /run/lock). the paths.h header defines _PATH_VARRUN to /var/run. the question: do we care ? i.e. should we change it to /run to match what all distros are doing ? or does the fact that /var/run is guaranteed to be a valid path to /run sufficient to ignore the issue (and basically say that it's a moot point) ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |