This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Complete example in error message documentation.
- From: ricaljasan <ricaljasan at pacific dot net>
- To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:44:58 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Complete example in error message documentation.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <544C4138 dot 8090203 at pacific dot net> <544CA0EB dot 8030205 at pacific dot net> <20150305190833 dot GC19311 at vapier> <54F91272 dot 7030409 at pacific dot net> <20150306055634 dot GG12857 at vapier> <54F94868 dot 7040300 at pacific dot net> <20150306065330 dot GM12857 at vapier>
On 03/05/2015 10:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 05 Mar 2015 22:25, ricaljasan wrote:
>> On 03/05/2015 09:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> if you're looking at doing more work, then we probably should make sure you have
>>> copyright assignment in place. have you gone through that process yet ?
>>
>> Nope; probably since the other submissions were never committed. (Which
>> does make this my first patch. :) Happy to get the ball rolling though.
>
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist?highlight=%28checklist%29#FSF_copyright_Assignment
>
> basically follow this form:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/plain/doc/Copyright/request-assign.future
That process is now started.
>
>>> i'll push this one since it's just deleting lines and you don't really need
>>> copyright assignment to *delete* things :).
>>
>> I thought you reviewed this. I made at least one line of material
>> change - now the example function works. ;)
>
> sorry, i confused your patch with the one i wrote while reviewing yours
> -mike
>
Is that the general approach I should take while fixing the manual,
then? Cleaner diffs, I suppose, than:
sed '/subjective cruft/{s/.*/@c &/}'
Rical Jasan