This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Ondřej Bílka <neleai at seznam dot cz>, Andrew Senkevich <andrew dot n dot senkevich at gmail dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:05:28 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMXFM3u6ffGkx5UtVPZwLRzpSh8JfsV2Y1+SK3i+d7Vv45dFuw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20141223191500 dot GA9130 at domone> <20141230152523 dot GA4950 at gmail dot com>
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 08:15:00PM +0100, OndÅej BÃlka wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 02:56:10PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > it is ping for patch which was discussed at the beginning of august,
> > > end of discussion is
> > > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-08/msg00078.html
> > >
> > > Is it Ok for trunk?
> > >
> > It looked OK for me performancewise. I planned to check that for bugs
> > which is still in my TODO list. If somebody else checked that it would
> > be ok to commit.
>
> I checked it in with a couple fixes:
This sort of new optimized functions should have a NEWS entry.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
- References:
- [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Re: [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Re: [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores