This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [ping][PATCH][BZ #13862] Reuse of cached stack can cause bounds overrun of thread DTV
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Paul Archard <paul dot archard at proceranetworks dot com>, OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo dot ham at samsung dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:39:18 -0800
- Subject: Re: [ping][PATCH][BZ #13862] Reuse of cached stack can cause bounds overrun of thread DTV
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1385453523-19632-1-git-send-email-myungjoo dot ham at samsung dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311261358020 dot 29140 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <00a901ceead2$d96bb770$8c432650$ at proceranetworks dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311270109090 dot 31261 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20140116182120 dot GA20838 at domone dot podge> <20140204121120 dot GB22572 at domone dot podge> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1402041422330 dot 18044 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <00c301cf21d3$ca7253e0$5f56fba0$ at proceranetworks dot com> <CAMe9rOpjQdvOQmcJ40URrLwNZDCqK+TV5s=Uf+ozsOB-7tpBFQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1411261622420 dot 854 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAMe9rOrK-sdgGwKHX2HxBiO=6nFeo9mXzj6ue79qe5eOYDiVAA at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1411261707030 dot 854 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is Paul's paperwork ready now?
>> >
>> > There is an assignment for past and future changes (dated 2014-5-13) and a
>> > disclaimer from Procera Networks for past changes (dated 2014-1-21).
>> >
>>
>> Can we move forward with Paul's fix?
>
> Someone needs to retest and resubmit it. It's so old it's not in
> patchwork (which only tracks patch submissions back to this March).
>
I will rebase and submit a new patch with a testcase.
--
H.J.