This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [RFC][MIPS] What to do about DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP and PIE


Matthew Fortune <matthew.fortune@imgtec.com> writes:
> I hadn't thought of just using the address of the DT_*RLD_MAP entry. It
> does look like it would be easy to implement.
> 
> If we choose to define a DT_GNU_RLD_MAP then I guess it should fit in
> with the tags which use the d_val rather than d_ptr as it is an offset
> rather than address. Proposed value is below:
> 
> #define DT_GNU_RLD_MAP 0x6ffffdf4
> 
> I unfortunately have to provide some solution to this out-of-tree to keep
> android development moving so will temporarily use a processor specific
> tag and switch to whatever this thread concludes. I'll use the scheme
> described here though for the content of the tag.

Any further opinions on this (whether to make it arch-independent or
just a new MIPS tag)?

Matthew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]