This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Status of SH for glibc 2.20?
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, thomas at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:31:28 -0400
- Subject: Re: Status of SH for glibc 2.20?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140908 dot 185935 dot 388693318 dot kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp> <540DB85A dot 40404 at redhat dot com> <20140909 dot 085816 dot 506857285 dot kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp> <20140909 dot 142020 dot 415912908 dot kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
On 09/09/2014 01:20 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
>>> Would one of you mind updating the SH section of the 2.20 release
>>> page on the wiki with that information? A list of the failures would
>>> be great.
>>>
>>> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.20
>>
>> Ugh, I've sent a wrong report. It seems that my sh4 machine
>> for the libc work is very unstable now and the processes
>> have been corrupt randomly. I'll try again when that machine
>> works correctly.
>
> I give up that machine. I've updated the SH section of wiki
> 2.20 page with the result on another board.
Excellent. Thank you very much for the quick work. This way other
developers can compare.
Cheers,
Carlos.