This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 17/19] Provide default definition for IS_IN when _LIBC is not defined


Please explain this more.  There must be on appearances of IS_IN or
anything like that in actual installed headers.  So I guess you are
talking about include/ wrappers for headers that will be installed.
But still I don't understand under what conditions any of this code
is used where _LIBC is not defined.  Is it just in tests?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]