This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 17/19] Provide default definition for IS_IN when _LIBC is not defined
- From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] Provide default definition for IS_IN when _LIBC is not defined
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1408618663-2281-1-git-send-email-siddhesh at redhat dot com> <1408618663-2281-18-git-send-email-siddhesh at redhat dot com>
Please explain this more. There must be on appearances of IS_IN or
anything like that in actual installed headers. So I guess you are
talking about include/ wrappers for headers that will be installed.
But still I don't understand under what conditions any of this code
is used where _LIBC is not defined. Is it just in tests?