This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Code freeze for glibc-2.20
- From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot gcc at googlemail dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:35:40 +0100
- Subject: Re: Code freeze for glibc-2.20
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <53E5D3A3 dot 70304 at archlinux dot org> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1408121519310 dot 11174 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
- Reply-to: ramrad01 at arm dot com
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2014, Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> Architecture maintainers, please report your build status on the wiki
>> page [1].
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Allan
>>
>> [1] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.20
>
> And don't list things as architecture-independent without sufficient
> analysis to show that they are, or to describe the conditions under which
> they are seen. Carlos, it seems you moved some conform/ test failures for
> semaphore.h, cpio.h and fmtmsg.h from AArch64 to architecture-independent
> (wiki page revision 22, 15 July). I don't see those failures on x86_64.
> Please move them back to the AArch64 section or add a description of the
> conditions the architecture should satisfy to get those failures ("uses
> generic version of header X" or similar) - or, better, fix them.
This is listed as an AArch64 GCC bug on that page -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441 . Is it really that
you don't see this failure on other architectures ?
Ramana
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> joseph@codesourcery.com