This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:13:11PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 06:06:43PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > See bug #14102: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14102 > > > > > > Even if nobody is willing to add the functionality immediately, can we > > > at least agree on a value it will have when it's added? > > > > This issue is really trivial and I've been waiting for someone to > > address it for almost 2 years now. Is the attached patch acceptable? > > You need to explain why you think ignoring the flag is a valid > implementation (or that defining it without implementing it is more > helpful to applications, or better accords with established glibc > conventions, than not defining it until there is an implementation). Trivial patch attached. Rich
Attachment:
ni_numericscope.diff
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |