This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Move remaining sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/nptl/ files

On 6/5/2014 12:01 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 06/03/2014 11:05 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
That looks adequate.  But...

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/nptl/bits/pthreadtypes.h: Move...
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/pthreadtypes.h: ... here.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/nptl/bits/semaphore.h: Move...
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/semaphore.h: ... here.
These could go into sysdeps/aarch64/nptl/bits/ instead.
Presumably sysdeps/aarch64/bits/ without the nptl subdir.  Sure.

It looks like x86 and arm are already using sysdeps/ARCH/nptl/bits, so perhaps better to be consistent, though?

Unfortunately, powerpc and alpha already followed your original proposal of moving to sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ARCH/bits for these files.  Roland, do you think the powerpc/alpha maintainers should adjust those paths to be consistent with x86 and arm?

I'm waiting on this decision for precedent as to how to move the sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tile files (as presumably are the ia64, m68k, microblaze, mips, and hppa maintainers).  Two possible places to put these files is bad enough; we certainly don't want three.

Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]