This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 04:42:14PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > There is an 'RFC' status available in the default list which we can > > use for such patches, but marking the patch as RFC by the submitter > > would mean that reviewers may never see them in the default view, > > which shows only unresolved patches, i.e. those in NEW state. > > My point is basically that such patches *shouldn't* be shown by default, > as they aren't pending review. Ahh OK, in that case, they can be marked as RFC to 'hide' them from the default view. > > I'll see if there's a way to change the default view so that it shows > > patches in states other than just NEW. If that is not possible > > immediately, then we could continue using the RFC and/or WIP tag on > > the email subject to indicate such patches. > > One thing that's visible in the present tracker data is that the subjects > of many patches don't really reflect the patch content. I think we'll > need conventions that if you post a patch in reply to something then you > change the Subject of your email to reflect the patch itself rather than > the thread it was in reply to. Ack, I have added this point to the document. Siddhesh
Attachment:
pgpaeLNvPJjI7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |