This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 03/05/2014 07:07 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 11:42:39AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:On 03/05/2014 10:13 AM, OndÅej BÃlka wrote:Changing default would be better. I dig while how to do it and can not find a nonugly solution. How should we do this?Isn't this a global ABI change? I don't think we can do this.No, it's just a change in the default exposed features. There's no ABI issue because programs built with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 access different symbols (the nasty namespace-violating ones with the 64 suffix) rather than the ordinary ones.
Doesn't it changes the definition of off_t and ino_t as well? While these aren't supposed to be used in public header files, such a change seems fairly risky to me.
-- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |