This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [2.20] [5/6] Generate overall summary of test results
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Brooks Moses <bmoses at google dot com>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:53:42 +0000
- Subject: Re: [2.20] [5/6] Generate overall summary of test results
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401100208000 dot 9412 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401100213340 dot 9412 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <52F965D4 dot 9070209 at google dot com>
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Brooks Moses wrote:
> > * In the toplevel Makefile, the rule for xtests is more minimal than
> > that for tests because there are no tests for xtests at top level.
> > Is this appropriate, or should it use $(xtests-special) despite that
> > variable being empty, and otherwise mimic the rule for tests? Or,
> > should we say that it's a deprecated feature to have tests at top
> > level at all, that such tests would best be moved into
> > subdirectories in separate patches, and so that keeping the xtests
> > rule minimal is the right thing to do because it shows what the
> > tests rule should look like once tests have been moved away from
> > toplevel?
> I have no opinion on this.
Does anyone else wish to comment on this point?
Joseph S. Myers