This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Remaining machine status updates for 2.19
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org>
- Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Adhemerval Zanella <azanella at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at gmail dot com>, David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, rth at redhat dot com, kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp, david dot holsgrove at xilinx dot com, Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:36:42 -0500
- Subject: Re: Remaining machine status updates for 2.19
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52F02F4A dot 1040706 at archlinux dot org> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1402040016190 dot 3754 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <52F036DB dot 4010905 at archlinux dot org> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1402040111160 dot 3754 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 02/03/2014 08:16 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Allan McRae wrote:
>
>>> As I said in <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-01/msg00340.html>,
>>> I don't think this is a sensible organization of the release page - I
>>> think there should be just one status section for each architecture.
>>
>> That seems reasonable - I missed that message. Feel free to just record
>> the information there. But we still need some information on the
>> compiler used.
>
> I've added more details (with reference to libgcc patches needed) to the
> 2.19 page, and reworked the generic
> <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/X.Y> into the form I think is
> more appropriate.
Looks good to me. Thanks for that!
Cheers,
Carlos.