This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [WIP] Remove nested function in elf/dl-lookup.c? (Nested functions considered harmful?)

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:33:20 -0500
Subject: Re: [WIP] Remove nested function in elf/dl-lookup.c? (Nested functions considered harmful?)
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <52AC8036 dot 7000300 at redhat dot com> <201312161151 dot 02195 dot vapier at gentoo dot org> <87zjo0o07l dot fsf at igel dot home>

On Monday 16 December 2013 18:17:02 Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:
> > On Monday 16 December 2013 11:12:09 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >> One question I had was: Why is the original function
> >> __attribute_noinline__?
> > 
> > the original commit that added this:
> > commit 021723ab784461de9eac57398ea16a47d4ab9366
> 
> Rather 871b91589bf4f6dfe19d5987b0a05bd7cf936ecc.

yeah, i was looking at the do lookup func itself and not the nested func

although they both lack in commit details ;)
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

References:
- [WIP] Remove nested function in elf/dl-lookup.c? (Nested functions considered harmful?)
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [WIP] Remove nested function in elf/dl-lookup.c? (Nested functions considered harmful?)
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: [WIP] Remove nested function in elf/dl-lookup.c? (Nested functions considered harmful?)
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]