This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2][BZ #14286] Fix integer overflow in vfwprintf.


ping
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:38:37AM +0200, OndÅej BÃlka wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > OndÅej BÃlka <neleai@seznam.cz> writes:
> > 
> > > 	[BZ #14286]
> > > 	* stdio-common/vfprintf.c: Fix integer overflow.
> > 
> > s/Fix/Check for/
> > 
> done.
> > > diff --git a/stdio-common/vfprintf.c b/stdio-common/vfprintf.c
> > > index 8cd7a85..ba6b6d1 100644
> > > --- a/stdio-common/vfprintf.c
> > > +++ b/stdio-common/vfprintf.c
> > > @@ -1067,7 +1067,12 @@ vfprintf (FILE *s, const CHAR_T *format, va_list ap)
> > >  	    /* Allocate dynamically an array which definitely is long	      \
> > >  	       enough for the wide character version.  Each byte in the	      \
> > >  	       multi-byte string can produce at most one wide character.  */  \
> > > -	    if (__libc_use_alloca (len * sizeof (wchar_t)))		      \
> > > +	    if (len > SIZE_MAX / sizeof (wchar_t))			      \
> > > +	      {								      \
> > > +		done = -1;						      \
> > > +		goto all_done;						      \
> > 
> > You need to set errno.  Use __glibc_unlikely.
> > 
> ok, but errno handling confused me. I copied that from case when malloc
> fails that if I read code correctly does not set ENOMEM. Should we add
> additional errnos there?
> 
> 
> 	[BZ #14286]
> 	* stdio-common/vfprintf.c: Check for integer overflow.
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]