Re: [RFC] Saturating using arithmetic in address calculation.

["Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>]

On Sat, 26 Oct 2013, Ondrej Bilka wrote:

> For that performance a assembly version/gcc builtin would be needed. A
> portable implementation would have comparable performance with manual
> checks.

For saturating multiplication in size_t where one argument is a constant, 
I don't think much optimization arises.  There may be other cases where 
such optimizations would be more significant.

I don't think C does a good job of providing fine control of overflow 
handling of integer operations, such as saturating arithmetic, although 
there are various purposes for which you'd like to do such an operation 
explicitly and let the compiler work out how best to optimize it for a 
given system, rather than writing more complicated C code and hoping that 
the compiler can recognize your idiom (see 
<http://saluc.engr.uconn.edu/refs/compiler/bik02idioms.pdf> for how some 
idioms might be recognized).  In particular, I think the TR 18037 
(embedded C) approach of saturating fixed-point types with a keyword _Sat 
is poorly matched to the uses of saturation in typical C code (it may be 
of more use to the target DSP audience of that TR) - and that the 
implementation approach for that TR in GCC, using a large number of new 
machine modes rather than lowering to operations on generic types and 
modes, is also problematic.

However, that TR 18037 approach is what there's so far been interest in 
standardizing, or in implementing in GCC, rather than any approach for 
operations with explicit overflow handling such as discussed in GCC PR 
48580.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com