This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH][BZ #13724] Do not segfault in pthread_setname_np (x, NULL)
- From: Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal dot cx>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:31:37 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH][BZ #13724] Do not segfault in pthread_setname_np (x, NULL)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20131003122009 dot GA8891 at domone dot podge> <524DCA52 dot 2030609 at redhat dot com> <20131007141928 dot GV20515 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <mvmli25xhm3 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <20131007145009 dot GX20515 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <mvmhactxhc3 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de>
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:53:48PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Rich Felker <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > You disagree with my opinion
> No, I agree to disagree.
OK, I think we're just having a language issue then. To me, "agree to
disagree" means "acknowledge that we disagree on an issue, that it's a
matter of opinion, and that we don't want to argue over it". But as I
understand it, your meaning is "I agree with your disagreement with
the originally stated position in question". Is this correct?