This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Tracking patch pings
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 19:05:04 +0000
- Subject: Re: Tracking patch pings
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305152117141 dot 21321 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <51948AF9 dot 7020702 at suse dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305161257580 dot 9498 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305162206040 dot 1874 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20130531122844 dot GA31794 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
On Fri, 31 May 2013, Ondrej Bilka wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:23:28PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > And looking at April for pending patches, there are some more cases
> > although they are a bit less clear:
> >
> Now patches that need action from april/may are:
Please update the wiki list.
> [PATCH][BZ #14412] Define __sincos_finite as a fast version of sincos
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00720.html
> Status?
Consensus is that this patch is wrong, so it should not be listed as
needing review.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com