This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Support separate benchmark outputs
- From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh dot poyarekar at gmail dot com>
- To: Ondřej Bílka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:17:59 +0530
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support separate benchmark outputs
- References: <20130416140355 dot GI3063 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <20130416155032 dot GA30216 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <CAAHN_R1U_8_OMuzVKJ2q2w8i_XWYrx0mYmvHodBLxmNLiznSkQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130416185720 dot GA790 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <CAAHN_R0AVLCRDf=Qp1269U3xxUN9LFh_+32mbjyvOVfqSC-rsw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130417061507 dot GA5120 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <CAAHN_R2xhvrwo=5L-0Q5cDPuUnn=wz--w1c_frJQwACDiWpE9Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130418194945 dot GA10374 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <CAAHN_R35_ikFMyjhYG-FKxzrXWM3z1Cob3-oyY3CYGnc1EmyZQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <5170F289 dot 5000900 at twiddle dot net> <20130419084016 dot GA5890 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
On 19 April 2013 14:10, OndÅej BÃlka <neleai@seznam.cz> wrote:
> Second part is adding benchmark for memcpy. It is based on scientificaly
> unsound methods and results from it will not be statisticaly
> significant.
It does not *add* a benchmark. It simply copies over an existing
benchmark from strings/test-memcpy.c. I did not explicitly move the
files over since the same code also has correctness tests in addition
to the performance tests.
Siddhesh
--
http://siddhesh.in