This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [COMMITTED] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Keld Simonsen <keld at keldix dot com>
- Cc: myllynen at redhat dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon at iki dot fi>, libc-locales at sourceware dot org, Petr Baudis <pasky at ucw dot cz>
- Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:28:30 -0400
- Subject: Re: [COMMITTED] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- References: <5141EF6D dot 9000601 at redhat dot com> <514334DF dot 8000306 at redhat dot com> <51434336 dot 3020103 at redhat dot com> <5149DAAA dot 9060309 at redhat dot com> <514A3E28 dot 6040409 at redhat dot com> <514ADCFA dot 7000009 at redhat dot com> <516086E3 dot 9090402 at redhat dot com> <20130407141804 dot GA17010 at www5 dot open-std dot org> <51619247 dot 1080203 at redhat dot com> <20130407191556 dot GA1153 at www5 dot open-std dot org>
On 04/07/2013 03:15 PM, Keld Simonsen wrote:
>> I don't know of any program actually using yesstr and nostr.
>
> Me neither. I was not aware that these keywords existed. Anyway, I
> will write some documentation for it.
I like your arguments. Could you help out the glibc community
by writing them into the wiki so we can use them as guidance
for future locale changes?
We have some initial information here:
http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Locales
Cheers,
Carlos.