This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Disable building with i386-*, -march=i386 or -mcpu=i386.


On 03/28/2013 11:49 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> If you agree that eliding i386 to i686 is acceptable then I'll file
> a BZ with the details of my initial work to remove i386, and add it
> to the master todo list.

I've added two i386 entries in the master todo list to discuss
merging and renaming:
http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Development_Todo/Master#i386

I'm not going to file a bug because there really isn't a serious
bug here, unlike the pthread_once cleanup bug I filed which also
points out spurious wakeups in several of the implementations.

The failure modes are fail-safe here. You compile for i386,
get i686, and try to run on i386 and it fails. The configure
log has a warning saying we elided to i686. There is no situation
that I can see where we run into any serious problems.

The patch makes the current state better in that we get less
confused users and we build successfully in more default
configurations.

The next enhancement would be to add --march=i?86
as you suggest in #c20 of BZ#10062 for any i?86-* builds, which
would solve the problem of a 32-bit compiler that defaults to
i386 code-gen and glibc configured for i686-* target. Which
previously failed at build time, and now will fail at configure
time.

I've checked in this version of the patch, I'm happy to back it
out if you have any objections. I feel like it's forward progress
and crosses off two more bugs.

Updated NEWS with BZ #10060 and #10062.

v2
- Remove i386 reference in README.
- Mention and close BZ#10060 and BZ#10062.

2013-03-22  Carlos O'Donell  <carlos@redhat.com>

	[BZ #10060, #10062]
        * aclocal.m4 (LIBC_COMPILER_BUILTIN_INLINED): New macro.
        * sysdeps/i386/configure.in: Use LIBC_COMPILER_BUILTIN_INLINED and
        fail configure if __sync_val_compare_and_swap is not inlined.
        * sysdeps/i386/configure: Regenerate.
        * configure.in: Build for i686 when configured for i386.
        * configure: Regenerate.
	* README: Remove i386 reference.

diff --git a/aclocal.m4 b/aclocal.m4
index 042a7e3..64351d0 100644
--- a/aclocal.m4
+++ b/aclocal.m4
@@ -248,3 +248,36 @@ dnl LIBC_CONFIG_VAR(make-variable, shell-value)
 AC_DEFUN([LIBC_CONFIG_VAR],
 [config_vars="$config_vars
 $1 = $2"])
+
+dnl Check that function FUNC was inlined as a builtin.  The code fragment
+dnl CODE is compiled with additional options CC_OPTION.  If FUNC is
+dnl not found in the assembly then it is assumed the compiler has support
+dnl for this builtin and has inlined the call.  If the compiler has the
+dnl feature then ACTION-IF-TRUE is called, otherwise ACTION-IF-FALSE.
+dnl It is up to the caller to provide a CC_OPTION that ensures the
+dnl builtin is inlined if present.
+dnl Warning: This may not work for some machines. For example on ARM the
+dnl ABI dictates that some functions should not be inlined and instead
+dnl should be provided by a compiler helper library e.g. __aeabi_memcpy.
+dnl This is done to reduce code size.
+dnl LIBC_COMPILER_BUILTIN([func], [code], [cc_option], [action-if-true], [action-if-false])
+AC_DEFUN([LIBC_COMPILER_BUILTIN_INLINED],
+[AC_MSG_CHECKING([for compiler support of inlined builtin function $1])
+libc_compiler_builtin_inlined=no
+cat > conftest.c <<EOF
+int _start (void) { $2 return 0; }
+EOF
+if ! AC_TRY_COMMAND([${CC-cc} $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS
+                    $3 -nostdlib -nostartfiles
+                    -S conftest.c -o - | fgrep "$1"
+                    1>&AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD])
+then
+  libc_compiler_builtin_inlined=yes
+fi
+rm -f conftest*
+if test $libc_compiler_builtin_inlined = yes; then
+  $4
+else
+  $5
+fi
+AC_MSG_RESULT($libc_compiler_builtin_inlined)])
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index bbdf156..d93ca5c 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -390,6 +390,15 @@ case "$machine-$host_os" in
     ;;
 esac
 
+# Configure for i686 if the user asks for i386. We don't support
+# i386 any more but it continues to be common for users to configure
+# 32-bit x86 as i386. We build for i686 instead.
+if test "$machine" = i386; then
+  machine="i686"
+  echo "\
+*** WARNING: Support for i386 is deprecated. Building for i686 instead."
+fi
+
 submachine=
 AC_ARG_WITH([cpu],
            AS_HELP_STRING([--with-cpu=CPU], [select code for CPU variant]),
diff --git a/sysdeps/i386/configure.in b/sysdeps/i386/configure.in
index 9967a16..56a7c1f 100644
--- a/sysdeps/i386/configure.in
+++ b/sysdeps/i386/configure.in
@@ -1,6 +1,25 @@
 GLIBC_PROVIDES dnl See aclocal.m4 in the top level source directory.
 # Local configure fragment for sysdeps/i386.
 
+# The GNU C Library can't be built for i386.  There are several reasons for
+# this restriction.  The primary reason is that i386 lacks the atomic
+# operations required to support the current NPTL implementation.  While it is
+# possible that such atomic operations could be emulated in the kernel to date
+# no such work has been done to enable this.  Even with NPTL disabled you still
+# have no atomic.h implementation.  Given the declining use of i386 we disable
+# support for building with `-march=i386' or `-mcpu=i386.' We don't explicitly
+# check for i386, instead we make sure the compiler has support for inlining
+# the builtin __sync_val_compare_and_swap. If it does then we should have no
+# problem building for i386.
+LIBC_COMPILER_BUILTIN_INLINED(
+  [__sync_val_compare_and_swap],
+  [int a, b, c; __sync_val_compare_and_swap (&a, b, c);],
+  [-O0],
+  [libc_cv_unsupported_i386=no],
+  [AC_MSG_ERROR([
+*** Building with -march=i386/-mcpu=i386 is not supported.
+*** Please use host i786, i686, i586, or i486.])])
+
 AC_CHECK_HEADER([cpuid.h], ,
   [AC_MSG_ERROR([gcc must provide the <cpuid.h> header])],
   [/* No default includes.  */])
diff --git a/README b/README
index 6fdfc03..bb4ccb8 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ implement the operating system behavior seen by user applications.
 In GNU/Hurd systems, it works with a microkernel and Hurd servers.
 
 The GNU C Library implements much of the POSIX.1 functionality in the
-GNU/Hurd system, using configurations i[34567]86-*-gnu.  The current
+GNU/Hurd system, using configurations i[4567]86-*-gnu.  The current
 GNU/Hurd support requires out-of-tree patches that will eventually be
 incorporated into an official GNU C Library release.
---


Cheers,
Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]