This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] strcpy optimizations

From: Petr Baudis <pasky at ucw dot cz>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert at cs dot ucla dot edu>
Cc: Ondřej Bílka <neleai at seznam dot cz>,andi at firstfloor dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:26:14 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] strcpy optimizations
References: <20130129201542.GA23023@domone.kolej.mff.cuni.cz><51083F61.4070103@cs.ucla.edu>

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:30:09PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> strncpy should be lower priority, I'd say.  Typically, a program
> that uses strncpy doesn't care all that much about performance.

That seems a most intriguing insight to me. Why would that be so?

				Petr "Pasky" Baudis

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] strcpy optimizations
  - From: OndÅej BÃlka

References:
- [RFC] strcpy optimizations
  - From: OndÅej BÃlka
- Re: [RFC] strcpy optimizations
  - From: Paul Eggert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]