This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Add finit_module syscall for Linux
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Kees Cook <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:31 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Seems they can be separated 5 categories
>> 1. only one or few specific application use.
>>> delete_module(2) [calling signature changed in 2.6.x]
>>> s390_runtime_instr(2) [s390 specific]
>>> spu_create(2) [PowerPC specific]
>>> spu_run(2) [PowerPC specific]
>>> subpage_prot(2) [PowerPC specific]
> Is the suggestion that this one/few use category shouldn't be handled
> by glibc?
I only said, "I have no opinion because _I_ don't see such usecase".
I think this category should be case-by-case. Especially, actual user
want libc support or not.
Sorry for bringing confusing to you.