This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: backtrace semantics
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, David Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I'd say you should always list the caller of backtrace() in the frame.
>> In gdb when you issue `bt' you always get the caller in the backtrace.
> Fair enough, I'll fix sparc to match.
> I hope other port maintainers are paying attention :-)
Don't sound so defeatist. If you really want to be
different try coming up with some creative counter
As a user *I* want to see all the frames from the point
at which the function call occurs. It seems most
logical to me that the frame I'm in should be included.