This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 18:33:53 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 14 January 2013 15:24:09 Jeff Law wrote: > > This has been observed on a 32 processor power7 machine running 16 > > instances of the attached testcase in parallel after a period of several > > hours. > > i let 3 run on an ia64 dual core box for about 12 hrs and didn't see > failures. which isn't to say there isn't a bug, just providing some data. ran the test both before & after the change for ~48 hrs and still didn't hit an issue. should be fine to just assume they didn't randomly hit the tiny instruction sequence window and the new change looks correct, so i'll kill them now. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |