This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][BZ #14417] Unlock mutex before going back to waitingfor PI mutexes

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 23:04:39 +0530
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BZ #14417] Unlock mutex before going back to waitingfor PI mutexes
References: <20120921195115.2319b183@spoyarek><1348943552.3374.5816.camel@triegel.csb><20121001112156.05223618@spoyarek><5069BAFA.7060504@redhat.com><CAMe9rOoHZBD=ga0Sw3D3DNrzgiRz_BtpZBQ1av=GiWrSGqapeQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:48:10 -0700, H.J. wrote:
> We abort when something bad happens, at least in ld.so and nptl,
> see nelf/dl-reloc.c, ptl/forward.c and nptl/unwind.c
> 

Right, but there are no assembly implementations with any asserts and
extraneous internal error checks AFAICT.

Regards,
Siddhesh

References:
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #14417] Unlock mutex before going back to waitingfor PI mutexes
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #14417] Unlock mutex before going back to waitingfor PI mutexes
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH][BZ #14417] Unlock mutex before going back to waiting forPI mutexes
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]