This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Get rid of ASM_SIZE_DIRECTIVE (take 2)
On 9/19/2012 7:58 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:57:17PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 9/18/2012 1:06 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>>> That looks fine to me, though I am having second thoughts about the exact
>>> choice of name. SYMBOL_SIZE doesn't really communicate that it computes
>>> based on ., i.e. that the placement of the macro relative to assembly code
>>> following the symbol is crucial. Good names are not coming to mind just now.
>>
>> Imply that it's computed: SYMBOL_CALC_SIZE?
>>
>> Imply that it's positional: SYMBOL_HERE_SIZE?
>
> Or what about 'COMPUTE_SYMBOL_SIZE' or 'SYMBOL_SIZE_EXPR' or just
> 'SIZE_EXPR'? I tried to find something similar in binutils and kernel, but they
> aren't using any kind of macro for this.
I like SIZE_EXPR, and suggest we use *_EXPR to describe macros with positional
parameters that might change if moved.
Cheers,
Carlos.
--
Carlos O'Donell
Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
carlos_odonell@mentor.com
carlos@codesourcery.com
+1 (613) 963 1026