This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Saturday 15 September 2012 16:10:36 H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> Pretty sure we require recent enough versions of gcc/binutils to make > >> this check pointless. I can't any logs in the last few years where > >> this check didn't return "yes". > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > >> > >> 2012-08-12 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > >> > >> * config.h.in (HAVE_CPP_ASM_DEBUGINFO): Delete. > >> * sysdeps/i386/configure.in: Remove assembler-with-cpp debug > >> check. * sysdeps/i386/configure: Regenerated. > >> * sysdeps/i386/sysdep.h (ENTRY): Remove calls to > >> STABS_CURRENT_FILE1, STABS_CURRENT_FILE, and STABS_FUN. > >> (END): Remove call to STABS_FUN_END. > >> (STABS_CURRENT_FILE1): Delete. > >> (STABS_CURRENT_FILE): Likewise. > >> (STABS_FUN): Likewise. > >> (STABS_FUN_END): Likewise. > >> (STABS_FUN2): Likewise. > >> * sysdeps/x86_64/configure.in: Remove assembler-with-cpp debug > >> check. * sysdeps/x86_64/configure: Regenerated. > > > > This caused: > > > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14587 > > > > We now have > > > > config.make.in:have-cpp-asm-debuginfo = @libc_cv_cpp_asm_debuginfo@ > > configure:libc_cv_cpp_asm_debuginfo > > configure.in:AC_SUBST(libc_cv_cpp_asm_debuginfo) > > Makeconfig:ifeq ($(have-cpp-asm-debuginfo),yes) > > > > Since libc_cv_cpp_asm_debuginfo is never yes, we never generate > > debug info for assembly codes. > > I checked in this as an obvious fix. thanks! -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |