This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Active release branches
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:22:46 -0400
- Subject: Re: Active release branches
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1208221331370.30045@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On 8/22/2012 9:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> <http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release> claims all the release branches
> from 2.11 onwards are maintained. Are all of these really still active,
> or should we move some, possibly 2.11 through 2.14, to a separate list of
> (former) maintainers and wiki pages for inactive release branches? (None
> of those branches have had any commits to either libc or ports since
> December 2011.)
>
I have work to do on 2.15 and 2.16 and plan to make a release for each of them in the short term.
I think 2.11 to 2.14 are now closed.
Is it important to mark a branch as open or closed?
What do we gain from this categorization?
Cheers,
Carlos.
--
Carlos O'Donell
Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
carlos_odonell@mentor.com
carlos@codesourcery.com
+1 (613) 963 1026