This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi! I'm not reproducing the issue originally reported. Without looking at all at the stub-syscalls infrastructure (and I don't have a stub-syscalls.c file), I'm guessing that's presumably because my kernel headers are "too new" (Linux 3.2.10). Kaz which version are you using? On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:11:52 -0700, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote: > > Yes, it happened without roland/getrlimit change. > > The stub-syscalls.c rule was always broken for this case. > I fixed it on the roland/getrlimit branch. It's less practical > to try to fix it independent of that change. Does this mean that the problem is solved once applying the roland/getrlimit changes? > > fanotify_mark EXTRA fanotify_mark i:iiiiis __fanotify_mark fanotify_mark@@GLIBC_2.16 > > Does this not get the right version without the @@... syntax? As Kaz already pointed out: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-06/msg00294.html> and following. Does that approach survive your post-mortem examination? GrÃÃe, Thomas
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |